Voting Rights Act of 1965
Postwar United States (1945 to early 1970s)
A National Archives Foundation educational resource using primary sources from the National Archives
Published By:
Historical Era:
Thinking Skill:
Bloom’s Taxonomy:
Grade Level:
Guiding question: To what extent was Reconstruction a revolution?
1. Discuss guiding question
If Part 2 will be done with the whole class, ask the students to share their responses to the guiding question, taking into account information from all seven of the documents as well as the introductory discussion on revolutions in Part 1.
2. Examine the Voting Rights Act of 1965
Open the activity in Part 2 so that students can see the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Hold a class discussion on this document. Ask students to compare the date of this document to the date of the constitutional amendment it was created to enforce.
Students working individually or in groups can email their responses to these questions in anticipation of further class discussion.
3. Re-examine answers to guiding question
Return to full class discussion of the guiding question—To what extent was Reconstruction a revolution?
After discussion, students can revise their answer to the guiding question, or explain why they their answer has not changed.
4. Lesson extension
Ask students what document, if it existed, could help answer the guiding question. Brainstorm a list of questions that remain unanswered after having reviewed the documents, as well as questions raised by the documents themselves. Direct students to create the “missing” document, complete with details such as letterhead, stamps, handwritten notes, images, etc., and then explain how this document fills in the hole in the story. Have students explain the likelihood/possibility that something like this document actually exists, and if so where.
This activity is a continuation of To What Extent was Reconstruction a Revolution? (Part 1). Students will examine the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and determine whether their analysis of this document changes their responses to the guiding question regarding the revolutionary nature of the Reconstruction era.