This school policy was entered as defendants' Exhibit 3 in
John F. Tinker et. al. v.
The Des Moines Independent Community School District et. al. It describes that Des Moines principals will take disciplinary action if the conduct or dress of a student is believed to be distracting to that student or others.
Earlier in the month, a group of junior high and high school students had
decided to wear black arm bands from December 16th until New Year's Day to peacefully show their support for a Vietnam War truce and express their "grief over the deaths of soldiers and civilians in Vietnam."
On December 14, Des Moines School District principals met and enacted a rule that "any student wearing an arm band would be asked to remove the arm band, and if he refused he would be suspended until he returned without the arm band." The policy was announced to all students on December 15, as well as
reported in The Des Moines Register.
The version of the policy shown here was typed up on December 23, when secondary principals met again and decided not to alter their earlier decision.
Students Mary Beth Tinker, John Tinker, Christopher Eckhardt, and two others were
suspended after refusing to remove their black arm bands when they arrived at school on December 16th and 17th. About a dozen other students also wore arm bands. Upon their suspensions, the Tinkers and Eckhardt refused to return to school until after New Year's Day – the intended period for wearing the arm bands.
With assistance from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the Tinker and Eckhardt families filed a complaint against the school district for violation of the right to free speech under the First Amendment, and further that First Amendment rights are protected from state infringement (such as a public school board) under the due process clause in the Fourteenth Amendment.
The Tinkers and Eckhardts
testified that their purpose for wearing the arm bands was to mourn those who died in the Vietnam War and to support Senator Robert Kennedy's proposal that the truce proposed for Christmas Day 1965 be indefinitely extended.
The U.S. District Court dismissed the case, agreeing with the school district's actions, based on their claim that the arm bands would have caused a disruption at the school. After the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit split evenly over the decision, thus upholding the District Court decision by default, the Tinkers and Eckhardts appealed their case to the Supreme Court.
In the landmark 1969
Tinker v.
Des Moines decision, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, the Tinkers and Eckhardts. In the opinion, written by Supreme Court Justice Abe Fortas, the Court stated "[The wearing of arm bands] was closely akin to 'pure speech' which, we have repeatedly held, is entitled to comprehensive protection under the First Amendment." Further, "It can hardly be argued that either students or teachers shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate," Justice Fortas wrote for the majority.
This primary source comes from the Records of District Courts of the United States.
National Archives Identifier:
7788707Full Citation: Defendants' Exhibit 3 in John F. Tinker et. al. v. The Des Moines Independent Community School District et. al.; 12/23/1965; Civil Case Number 7-1810-C1; John F. Tinker et. al. v. The Des Moines Independent Community School District et. al.; Civil Case Files, 1938 - 1997; Records of District Courts of the United States, Record Group 21; National Archives at Kansas City, Kansas City, MO. [Online Version, https://docsteach.org/documents/document/student-policy-desmoines, December 6, 2024]